[dm-crypt] The weird bug again: semid XXXXXX: semop failed for cookie 0xdeadbeef: incorrect semaphore state
corsac at debian.org
Thu Aug 18 22:49:33 CEST 2011
On jeu., 2011-08-18 at 10:56 +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> >> Despite I like the idea of sandboxing I have to ask
> >> why it is part of "browser" and not some separate package.
> >> What's next? Bundled kernel? :)
> > Because each tab is sandboxed. There's a seccomp sandbox available too.
> It doesn't mean it should install trillion of bundled libraries.
> (Not that other browsers are much bettter...)
Though that's quite unrelated. But they intend to provide a seccomp
sandbox library at one point, see
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the dm-crypt