[dm-crypt] Added: References Section for the FAQ
Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón
tazok.id0 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 26 00:47:25 CEST 2012
On 26/08/12 00:26, Arno Wagner wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:09:03AM +0200, Javier Juan Mart?nez Cabez?n wrote:
>> Do you want mean something like this?: if you want steganography please
>> just check linux/crypto/seed.c and try to figure the hidden message that
>> exists in this, so if you want to make your data hidden, make a crypto
>> Sorry Sorry Sorry Sorry.... I couldn't resist it.
> On the plus side, that would get rid (maybe) of all the people
> that do not understand the point of cryptsetup and want stego
> in there.
> In the minus side it is not funny, but rather tragic. (Which
> in turn is funny ;-)
> Seriously, I do not want/need anything, but recent discussions
> make a reference section look like a good idea and several
> people proposed to have one. It also gives the FAQ a wider
> focus. At present it is basically 100% written by me and
> my view of things may have blind spots and a certain slant.
> With references, longer writings by others get a proper place
> and broaden what people are pointed to.
>> 2012/8/25 Arno Wagner <arno at wagner.name>
>>> If you want a "Humor" category, the references in it have to be
>>> 1. really funny 2. really relevant and 3. actually give insights.
>>> Example: http://xkcd.com/538/ (I think I will add that one myself.)
>> dm-crypt mailing list
>> dm-crypt at saout.de
When I tried to understand at first time crypto questions the first
source file I check was this, after that the RFC, after that I didn't
understood anything, just the two magic commentaries that still in my mind.
PD: All your afforts are really apreciated, just I ask you one thing,
please don't add my horrible english as a new high entropy algorithm
crypto driver :P
More information about the dm-crypt