[dm-crypt] should luksClose command wait for sync ?

Arno Wagner arno at wagner.name
Wed Jan 11 18:37:50 CET 2012


I think the issue here is that mkfs.ext2 calls fsync(), but
for some reason fsync() does not flush to disk or only flushes
one layer. I would expect that is a current bug/"feature" of
the device-mapper, although I dimly remember there were issues
with fsync() itself.

Better leave the sync in there for the time being.

Arno


On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:51:21PM +0100, Toralf F??rster wrote:
> WRT to this discussion:
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6925154.html#6925154
> 
> I'm wondering whether a command sequence like the follwoing needs a sync or 
> not :
> $> mkfs.ext2 /dev/mapper/foo && sync && cryptsetup luksClose foo
> 
> -- 
> MfG/Sincerely
> Toralf F??rster
> pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt at saout.de
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

-- 
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno at wagner.name 
GnuPG:  ID: 1E25338F  FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C  0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty 
are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled 
with doubt and indecision. -- Bertrand Russell 


More information about the dm-crypt mailing list