[dm-crypt] Documentation inconsistency -- On-Disk Format

Arno Wagner arno at wagner.name
Fri Nov 21 11:00:15 CET 2014


On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:32:11 CET, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 03:51 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> > I just noticed that in the LUKS On-Disk Format Specification document 1.2.1
> > http://wiki.cryptsetup.googlecode.com/git/LUKS-standard/on-disk-format.pdf
> > the LUKS key slots are numbered 1-8, whereas all the tools number them 0-7.
> 
> It is just for "historic" reasons. I can fix it in documentation but old
> documentation is still in place (it is installed e.g. as docs in various distros).
> It could make the problem even worse.
> 
> (And changing tools means breaking user scripts which is even worse.)
> 
> It is not the first standard which uses pseudo-code description while real
> implementation differs in details.
> 
> > That makes communication difficult.
> 
> I do not think so. When dealing with users problem always the tool output
> is important. The slot offsets depends on key size so you must have always
> proper luksDump output for the device.
> 
> Milan

I would also not change the tools. And FAQ Item 6.12 provides an
alternate reference with numbering 0-7 and all offsets
in hex and dec. I also do not think changing the spec is needed.

Arno

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt at saout.de
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

-- 
Arno Wagner,     Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform.,    Email: arno at wagner.name
GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718  FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF  B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718
----
A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier


More information about the dm-crypt mailing list