[dm-crypt] "re-encrypting" ?
arno at wagner.name
Sun Aug 14 18:59:29 CEST 2011
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 14.08.2011, Arno Wagner wrote:
> > It is on some architectures. It is also less secure.
> As far as I know, both Serpent and Twofish has shown to be more secure than
> Rijndael. However, Rijndael was choosen as the new AES because of its overall
> qualities (speed on various architectures, simplicity..).
> Anyway, I doubt this is playing an important role since none of these algorithms
> has been broken yet.
Indeed. One argument is that AES will get more scrutiny, as it is
more critical for the world. Typically it should not matter though.
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt at saout.de
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno at wagner.name
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier
More information about the dm-crypt