[dm-crypt] "re-encrypting" ?

Arno Wagner arno at wagner.name
Sun Aug 14 18:59:29 CEST 2011

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 14.08.2011, Arno Wagner wrote: 
> > It is on some architectures. It is also less secure.
> As far as I know, both Serpent and Twofish has shown to be more secure than 
> Rijndael. However, Rijndael was choosen as the new AES because of its overall
> qualities (speed on various architectures, simplicity..).
> http://csrc.nist.gov/archive/aes/round2/comments/20000515-bschneier.pdf
> Anyway, I doubt this is playing an important role since none of these algorithms
> has been broken yet.

Indeed. One argument is that AES will get more scrutiny, as it is
more critical for the world. Typically it should not matter though.


> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt at saout.de
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno at wagner.name 
GnuPG:  ID: 1E25338F  FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C  0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier 

More information about the dm-crypt mailing list