[dm-crypt] dm-crypt LUKS and USB power management

Ritesh Raj Sarraf rrs at researchut.com
Mon May 30 18:44:08 CEST 2016

On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 03:04 +0200, Axel Heider wrote:
> I wonder if there are any ideas how dm-crypto or LUKS can handle this
> case. Or is the recommendation that the USB suspend should not happen
> at all for devices that are broken (ie. that disconnect and reconnect
> on resume)?
> Even if all handles on /dev/sda are released internally, there is not
> really a guarantee that the devices comes back as /dev/sda are the
> disconnect/reconnect. However, the UUID should be the same, so that
> could be used to detect it's the same device and partition then and
> accesses get re-routed to it then transparently.

I doubt if it could be done clean. Most targets in Device Mapper ask for careful

Red Hat (leading Linux vendor) still seems to be recommending that.

I would rather investigate the (flaky) USB device. First, does it happen only
when Runtime PM is enabled ? If so, you should just blacklist it from Power
Management. Many devices, under Linux, report (false) PM capabilities.

Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC
me in replies for quicker response
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/attachments/20160530/06f06787/attachment.asc>

More information about the dm-crypt mailing list